OVER $100,000.00 MISSING

YOUR GOVERNMENT WILL DO NOTHING!

LIVING IN MANSIONS WHILE RELATIVE IS BEING TORTURED IN ABJECT POVERTY

LIVING IN MANSIONS IN BEVERLY HILLS, MORAGA, DANVILLE AND BLACKHAWK, CALIFORNIA, WHILE RELATIVE IS BEING TORTURED IN ABJECT POVERTY

Equestrian Travel Mall and Legal Services
2660 Shasta Way #4
Klamath Falls, OR 97603
kini@uquestlegal.com

September 12, 2006

Alco Iron and Metal Co.
Attn: Kem Kantor
1091 Doolittle Drive
San Leandro, CA 94577
(510) 562-1107

FIFTH REQUEST

RE: For Purposes of Clearing Credit and Liability

Dear Kem:

As a victim of the crime, slander and libel, and not a “deadbeat” debtor, your association with the financial abuse your dad has allowed for the COSMA FAMILY TRUST includes misusing and stealing the resources of, but not limited to, are as follows:

The victim being unaware of who the Power of Attorney was given, recent changes in or the creation of the trust, its funds and income, real property, papers, credit, selling assets and property accounts are still missing.

The victims’ bills have stacked up and have not been paid and have caused perplexity.

Person(s) in charge of victim’s portion of the trust fund have spent excessive amounts with increased number of checks made out to others from victims’ portion of trust funds.

The unusual, erratic, or inappropriate activity in the bank account(s) and surrounding investment(s) are uncharacteristic of the intent of the original trust.

There have been irregularities on tax returns.

The victim being unaware of the reasons for appointments with the bankers, attorneys, or others regarding her portion of the trust funds.

Refusing to spend money on the victim including decent housing, business opportunities, education, and food forcing victim to have to endure cruel hardships.

Unreasonable rules or unfair application of rules.

The continued abusive practices to victim have been common warning signs such as:

Violent physical harm and injury

Failure to provide basic care

Unwanted sexual contact

Financial exploitation

Verbal/mental abuse

Abandonment of family members or other individuals who have been unable to look out for victim.

Voiced grievances and self-neglect that has led to harm psychological or otherwise.

Therefore, it would be in the best interest of the victim to mail all information regarding the trust funds to:

Kini Cosma
2660 Shasta Way #4
Klamath Falls, OR 97603


Please Note: The person answering at the department** below has indicated to me that he has no intention of upholding the RULES OF LAW, NOR will he enforce THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

**Mr. Bryant G. Snee
Assistant Director Commerical Litigation Branch
Civil Division
United States Department of Justice
1100 ‘L’ Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 616-0315
or Facsimile: (202) 514-8624

Cc: Equifax Experian Fraud Victim Assistance Division Fraud Victim Assistance Division
P.O. Box 740241 P.O. Box 9530
Atlanta, GA 30374-0241
Allen, TX 75013

Trans Union Attorney General’s Consumer Hotline Fraud Victim Assistance Division
Financial Fraud and Consumer Protection Section
P.O. Box 6790 1162 Court Street, NE
Fullerton, CA 92634

Salem, OR 973011(877) 844-9392

Consumer Sentinel Project Team
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20580

Securities and Exchange Commission if believed that someone has tampered with securities or brokerage accounts

The Federal Trade Commission is available to help through its I.D. Theft Hotline. www.consumer.gov/idtheft/recovering_idt.html#9
www.ftc.gov www.consumer.gov/idtheft

THE IMPACT ONE BULLY HAS

Stay tuned

Actual damages, expectation damages, general damages, compensatory damages, special damages, attorney’s fees, costs of suit(s), future damages, implied damages, exemplary damages, punitive damages, reliance damages, nominal damages, incidental damages, tremble damages, consequential damages, foreseeability of damages, liquidated damages, mitigation of damages, lost profits from businesses and investments, lost earnings, damages for emotional/mental distress, pain and suffering, injunctive relief, specific performance, loss of consortium...

How To Lose A $100,000.00 A Year Job

Kini Cosma
2660 Shasta Way #4
Klamath Falls, OR 97603
541-884-1085

THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case No.: 1:05-CV-01201-LAS

Kini Cosma, Plaintiff,

Vs.

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT-NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT-EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et. al. Defendants.

SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS

TO: THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al.; THE NAPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

PLEASE TAKE NOTE under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Section 1987(c), And, the provision of the Anti-Terror Patriot Act authorizing the Inspector General to review complaints about civil liberties and civil right abuses involving Justice Department Personnel, Plaintiff Kini Cosma hereby demands that on or before the date set for trial in the matter of this case, FAILURE TO AWARD, et. seq., produce the documents described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, at the above-entitled Court, addressed as follows:

Clerk of the United States Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW, Room 103
Washington, DC 20005

Since the 24th of May, 1996
Kini Cosma

Exhibit A
I.

The witness, the Napa Superior Court, has possession or control of the following documents or other things and shall produce them at the time and place specified in page 1.

(1) The WORKPLACE RESTRAINING ORDER that should have been signed by the E M P L O Y E R in the criminal matter of XXXXXXXXX, Case No. CR26838, filled out, signed and filed in the Superior Court of Napa County, State of California executed on or about: October 12, 1995 by then Police Sargeant RANDY BOWMAN, E M P L O Y E E of the City of Napa Police Department.

(2) POWER OF ATTORNEY signed by Principal, E M P L O Y E R and Police Sargeant Randy Bowman, E M P L O Y E E of the City of Napa Police Department, State of California in regards to the legal document specified in paragraph (1), page 3.

(3) PRINCIPAL’S MANIFESTATION OF CONSENT for the execution of the said legal document in paragraph 1, page 3 (i.e. payroll checks signed by said E M P L O Y E E, procuration letter, search warrants)

(4) The CALIFORNIA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION CARD of Police Sargeant Randy Bowman, E M P L O Y E E of the City of Napa Police Department, State of California in regards to the legal document described in paragraph 1, page 3.

II.

Good cause exists for the production of the documents or other things described in paragraphs 1-4 of page 3 for the following reasons:

(1) To show that California Judicial Counsel Form XXXXX of 1995: THE WORKPLACE RESTRAINING ORDER, was designed to bring about past and present prosecutions, and distinct and palpable injuries described in damage reports WAS NEVER VALID IN THE FIRST PLACE.

(2) To display the fairly traceable UNAUTHORIZED SIGNATURE and/or indorsement by Police Sargeant Randy Bowman, an E M P L O Y E E of the City of Napa Police Department, State of California.

(3) To show THERE WAS NOT A FORMAL APPOINTMENT OF AGENT AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW who executed this legal document. And, to prove the extent of negligent and reckless instruction and supervision by the Principal who gave the actual, implied, or apparent authority for such professional services against Plaintiff who was engaged in constitutionally protected activity.

(4) To show the onset when PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OFFICIALS BEGAN TO FLOUT THE LAW with ongoing patterns of propensities for extortion, violence, deliberate indifference, and retaliation against Plaintiff as a result of her being a complaining witness while redressing her grievances.

(5) To show that, inter alia, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA would not be held accountable, nor have to pay Plainitiff’s claims and summary judgments so that:

(a) Plaintiff could not afford effective counsel
(b) Malicious prosecutions could be justified
(c) Whatever financial resources Plaintiff had left would be exhausted
(d) Plaintiff could be compelled to submit by force or by threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping;
(e) To substantially impair Plaintiff’s power to appraise or control her conduct.

III.

These documents or other things described in paragraph 1-4, page 3, are material to the issues involved in this case for the following reasons:

(1) TO SHOW THERE WAS AN ORCHESTRATED LITANY OF PLAINIFF’S BEDROCK RIGHTS VIOLATED. That it could be said Plaintiff suffered the present prosecution and coinciding injuries described in the Complaint as a result of not being appointed Assistance Of Counsel for her defense (Amendment VI) while incarcerated at the onset of the extortion by public officials (Subtitle D-Equal Justice For Women in the Courts Act section 40401. Short title)

(2) To show the pattern, NOT PREDICATED UPON A SINGLE ACT, but consisting of a persistent and continuous course of conduct that has had the ultimate effect of rendering authorized violations of the law by both public officials and private persons. (Extortion, retaliation, deliberate indifference, violence)

(3) To show THERE WAS NOT ANY CONCERTED EFFORT TO INVESTIGATE PLAINTIFF’S SUBSTANTIATED COMPLAINT(S) SINCE JULY 1995. All of Plaintiff’s reports and complaints were ignored, dismissed, and unresponded to.

I, Kini Cosma, hereby declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: November 15, 2005 Kini Cosma

Who Is Al-Qaida? -Fast Moving War On Terror-Prep 101

By Kini Cosma

On October 25, 2005, at approximately 8:00 a.m, PST., Esther was traveling along a double rural highway in the Northern California town of Susanville in Lassen County. Her small truck had several bales of hay balanced in the back. The speed limit was approximately 50 m.p.h. She slowed to a stop to make a left turn onto a very narrow overpass that went to a driveway. A white passenger van that appeared to be tailgating at a faster speed proceeded to pass her. Avoiding a collision with Esthers’ vehicle, the white passenger van swerved into the left lane and flew off into the neighbors front yard. The California Highway Patrol cited Esther for expired vehicle registration and no insurance.

QUESTION:

Does not having valid vehicle registration and no insurance
make Esther accountable for the negligence, damages, and injuries

from the self-inflicted passenger van?

ANSWER:
YES.

According to California. And, the U.S. Constitution. Article I: The Legislative Branch, Section 9, Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ Of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it.

What does that have to do with apples and oranges?

In a quandary as to Esthers’ legal rights and uncertain about the practical consequences on a finding that Esther was a dangerous sex offender, that she was ever guilty of such faults, wrong, or neglect as to forfeit her rights to participate in venture enterprises, Esther has had to suffer: systematic physical, legal, and psychological threats to safety, liberty, & development, torture, illegal detention, sexism, arbitrary arrest, invasion of privacy, freedom of expression, harassment, discrimination & retaliation through the ongoing pattern of increasingly petty psychological abuse cloaked with sadistic illegal hazing and bantering, malicious prosecution, abuse and overreaching of the courts, legal malpractice-ineffective counsel, false reports, defamation of character, false light, & civil conspiracy. She has been robbed of dignity, family, career, social life, education, health, and housing committed by government sanction.

Esther remains restrained beyond human tolerance and decency for the sake of arbitrary decision of the State to seek her commitment under one stature rather than the other. The Equal Protection Claim could then be buried along with Esther.

In other words, Esther is not entitled to equal protection and due process under the law. Access to the courts for any hearing whether it be a preliminary hearing or administrative hearing is an absolute privilege with similar procedural requirements.

Second Segment of Reoccurring Events

Moreover, it would be most cost effective for the State to grant Esther massive amounts of anxiety, apprehension, worry, anger, dizziness, slipping work performance while provoking short-temper with some persons, making her afraid equally of leaving the house and coming home, inducing fearfulness. Compelling social ostracism and having obstructed her legal remedies, she would suffer shame, humiliation, embarrassment, degradation and disgrace so that she could be emotionally deprived of becoming a member of a civilized society. A “civilized society” that would be more than happy to “go along with it…”.

By enhancing mental anguish or emotional distress consequent upon breaches of contract(s) in connection with sales of real property and in conjunction with being accorded the wrongful deprivation of her just bequest under her mother's estate trust by maliciously interfering with prospective rights of inheritance would all the more establish a more “lenient commitment standard.”

Written and oral falsehoods maliciously circulated without Esther‘s acknowledgement, which were made with the intention of producing injury, and did result in injuries because they are actionable as libels, slanders, and defamatory statements were willful and intentionally done without just cause, occasion, or excuse. The quasi courts made comments not of the enacting government body.

False statements injuring to mislead other persons into actions that have been detrimental. (i.e. employment, isolation, grouping, differentiation, exiling, splitting up allocation, detachment, prolonged grief, shame, humiliation, despair, bullying tactics, disappointment, ghettoization, ostracism, harassment, and intimidation.) All that goes beyond the possible bounds of decency and is atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.

Freedom from mental distress directly caused by wanton or outrageous conduct is entitled to legal protection independent of any other cause of action (Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc. 132 So. 2d. 321, 272 Ala. 174; Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc. 529 P.2d. 104, 215; Henderson v. Ripperger 594 P. 2d. 251, 3 Kan. App. 2d. 303), and where severe mental pain or anguish is inflicted through a deliberate and malicious campaign of harassment or intimidation, a remedy is available in the form of an action for the intentional infliction of emotional distress.

The extreme and outrageous nature of the conduct may arise not so much from what is done as from abuse by the defendant of some relation or position which gives the defendant actual or apparent power to damage the plaintiff’s interests. The result is something every much like extortion.

Not far removed from Esther’s cases are the ones of bullying a school girl, with threats of prison and public disgrace, unless she signed a confession of immoral misconduct (Johnson v. Sampson (1926) 167 Minn. 203, 208 N.W. 814); in bringing a mob to the Plaintiff’s door at night with a threat to lynch him unless he left town (Wilson v. Wilkins 1930, 181 Ark. 137, 25 S. W. 2d . 428. Cf. Ruiz v. Bertolotti (1962) 37 Misc. 2d. 1059, 291 N.Y.S. 2d. 189 (hounding Plaintiff on the streets); and in wrapping up a very gory dead rat instead of a loaf of bread, for a sensitive soul to open. (Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Roch (1930) 60 Md. 189, 153 A. 22)

In decoying a woman suspected of insanity to a hospital by a concocted tale of an injured husband and child (Savage v. Boies (1954) 77 Ariz. 355, 272 P.2d. 349); in spreading the false rumor that the Plaintiff’s son had hanged himself; (Bielitski v. Obadiak 1921, 61 Dom. L. Rep. 494);

Esther’s cases do not extend to mere insults, indignities, threats, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other trivialities (as the rough edges of our society are still in need of a good deal of filing down) but that she has been necessarily expected and required to be hardened to a certain amount of rough language, and to acts that are definitely inconsiderate and unkind. She had suffered conduct that has been so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree for so many years, it has resulted in continuing violations manifested in a number of incidents as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency.

In Samms v. Eccles (1961) 11 Utah 2d. 289, 358 P. 2d. 344; Halio v. Lurie, 1961, 15 A.D. 2d. 62, 222 N.Y.S. 2d. 759 an invitation to illicit intercourse, insufficient in itself, becomes extreme outrage when it is prolonged or repeated to the point of hounding, and accompanied by advertising in the form of indecent pictures or exposure; Where a man who had jilted a woman wrote her jeering verses and taunting letters; and Tate v. Canoica, 1960, 180 Cal. App. 2d. 898, 5 Cal. Rptr. 28; Where a man was driven to suicide by threats and accusations not set forth.

It is on these basis that these tort actions have been used against Esther in the most outrageous high-pressure methods from: THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES THEREOF, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, THE PLACER COUNTY COURT, THE LASSEN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF LASSEN, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, THE NAPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD (herein referred to as 'THE STATE'):

THEREIN COMPLAINED OF IN CASES U.S.C.A. 98-16415: U.S.C.A. 98-16415: U.S.C.A. 98-16672: U.S.C.A. 98-16673: U.S.C.C. 98-090819: U.S.D.C. 98-00618: U.S.D.C. CV-F-97-5994: CV-02-01704-WBS/GGH: U.S.C.A. 04-70711: 3rd. Appell. Dist: 3 Civil C028174: 3 Civil C031259: 3 Civil C046114: U.S.D.C. C-04-0618 SBA (PR); C.A. Supreme Ct. C028174: U.S.D.C. CIV-S-04-681 MCE GGH PS; Napa Superior Ct. CR26838; U.S.C.A. 03-15084; MIS-S-02-0236 WBS GGH-PS; Lassen Superior Ct. TR060989; TR059474; CR018285; TR050932; CR019489; JC36801; TR070589; TR071517; JC389326; JC38896; Placer Superior Ct. SJV2396...ET AL.

Just recently, Jackson v. Indiana, got his day in Court. The United States Supreme Court declared that Indiana’s statutory commitment procedures for accused persons bound to be mentally ill and unable to comprehend the proceedings against him violated equal protection and due process because they established a more lenient commitment standard and a more stringent release standard than those applicable to other persons civilly committed.

Also, just recently, Humphrey v. Cady, got his day in Court. The United States Supreme Court reversed a summary denial of habeas corpus and remanded for hearing a state prisoner’s claim that extension of his term of commitment on a finding that he was a dangerous sex offender violated equal protection and due process because he was not accorded trial by jury and other procedural rights given to persons civilly committed.

CAN THIS BE WHERE SOME OF THESE

OBSCURE GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHTS OCCUR?

Day after day, the Administration of Justice has granted equal protection claims to others. Yet, Esther has still not received judicial review to the malicious, obscure government oversights originally intended in her case that has now spun out of control and is in an extremely persuasive category regarding international human right violations and amounting to a Bill of Attainder. Instead, her claims have become defined as “Cases of Rebellion and/or Invasion that public safety may require it…”

Finally, as a result of not having her day in California State and Federal Courts, erroneously and improperly prosecuting, and refusing to bind witnesses over in the cases Esther complains of, Esther accuses the above of maintaining a link between organized crime and high political, social, and entertainment circles alleging defamatory statements concerning gross criminality sufficient enough to persuasively amount to international human right violations, violations of women’s rights and a Bill of Attainder.

CAN IT BE THAT ESTHER HAS BEEN SECRETLY INDICTED?

The U.S. Constitution. Article I: The Legislative Branch, Section 9, Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ Of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it.

REASONING:
Historically, the grand jury had been looked upon as a suitable device for protecting the weakness & unpopular from judicial harassment or politically motivated prosecutions. The purpose of the preliminary hearing was to weed out groundless or unsupported charges of grave offenses and to relieve the accused of the degradation and the expense of a criminal trial. Many an unjustifiable prosecution is stopped at that point, where the lack of probable cause is clearly disclosed.

The grand jury is supposed to function as a body of neighbors who aid the state in bringing criminals to justice while protecting the innocent from unjust accusation. However, both the grand jury and the criminal information have ceased to fulfill these original role-obligations and have been increasingly subject to incapacitating manipulation and abuse.

Indictment by grand jury affords none of the fundamental rights provided in a preliminary examination. Unless he is called as a witness, the defendant has neither the right to appear and present evidence to the grand jury nor to confront witnesses against him.

Furthermore, as indicate by the opening statement of Penal Code Section 939.7, the grand jury is “not required to hear evidence for the defendant,” and thus may reject such evidence at the very outset. Without hearing the evidence in the first place, the opportunity to determine whether evidence exists to “explain away the charge” is in effect foreclosed, virtually assuring the finding of an indictment under Penal Code Section 939.8 on the basis of “unexplained or uncontradicted” evidence.

CA law requires that there be an independent evidentiary determination of probable cause in an adversary proceeding before trial but no equivalent right is granted to an accused who is prosecuted by grand jury indictment.

Where an accused who is prosecuted by grand jury indictment is issued by the grand jury, the accused is not afforded the safeguard of an independent judicial evaluation of the evidence.

When the function of indictment is mated with the responsibility of determining the character of the evidence that supports it, and with the right to exclude all evidence which could explain or contradict, the result is not proper. In short, it is both derogatory of the jury’s basic purpose and devoid of fairness.

Thus a defendant who is subject to indictment by grand jury is denied the right to present evidence to explain or contradict the charge, has no right to appear or to have the assistance of counsel, and may not confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him.

THE TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE

Could this be where, the driver of the white passenger van, insured by Farmers’ Insurance Group, Michael Bertotti, related to Joseph J. Bertotti, Assistant Director to the County of Lassen, Department of Community Development possibly be related to Sharon Bertotti, a member of the Lassen County grand jury who on October 25, 2005, at approximately 8:00 a.m, PST., was traveling along a double rural highway in the Northern California town of Susanville in Lassen County proceeding at a speed limit exceeding 65 m.p.h. who had encountered a small truck that had several bales of hay balanced in the back, slowing to a stop to make a left turn onto a very narrow overpass that went to a driveway. And, then avoiding a collision by swerving into the left lane and colliding into the front yard of the Lassen County Sheriff‘s secretary? After all, in “Cases of Rebellion and/or Invasion that public safety may require it…” Esther would not be entitled to any kind of hearing to find out why her driver‘s license was suspended!

What does that have to do with apples and oranges? Maybe California can explain their manner of reasoning and answer these "relevant" questions by explaining why drivers who owe child support have their driver’s license suspended.

Subpeona For Demand Of Accountability

TO: THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
95 SEVENTH ST. P.O. BOX 193939
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-3939

DEAR ASSOCIATES:

ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 11, 1998, I FILED A MOTION TO SUSPEND THE POWERS OF THE TRUSTEE ALONG WITH A CONSOLIDATION OF ISSUES. SINCE THEN I HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE SILENT TREATMENT ABOUT MY PORTION OF THE COSMA TRUST FOR THE SOME OF APPROXIMATELY $200,000.00. I HAVE HEARD RUMORS IN THE FORM OF WHISPERING, HISSING, AND MURMURERS. ACCORDING TO FAST TRACK RULES OF THE COURT, ALL OF THESE MATTERS ARE WAY OVERDUE. SINCE I WAS NEITHER GIVEN DUE PROCESS OR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AS REQUIRED BY LAW, I AM PARTICULARY CONCERNED. MAYBE YOU CAN TELL THE FOLKS IN AMERICA WHY JUSTICE TAKES SO LONG IN SUCH A HEINOUS CASE LIKE MINE SO THAT WHEN IT'S THEIR TURN, THEY WILL KNOW THEY TOO WILL BE LEFT IN A STATE OF CONFUSION AND DEVASTATION AS WELL. with all due respect, kini. Kini Cosma-Nelms 2660 Shasta Way #4 Klamath Falls, OR 97603 (541) 884-1085

UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OR PROSECUTING COURT THEREIN Kini Cosma-Nelms, Plaintiff, vs. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, ET SEQ. Defendant(s). Case No.: 1:05-CV-01201-LAS SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS FOR FUTURE ANTICIPATED JURY TRIAL TO: THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AGENCIES THEREOF, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT-EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, THE PLACER COUNTY COURT, THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF KLAMATH, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF OREGON, THE NAPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD (herein referred to as public and private persons):

PLEASE TAKE NOTE under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure §1987 (c), And, the provision of the anti-terror Patriot Act authorizing the Inspector General to review complaints about civil liberties and civil right abuses involving Justice Department Personnel, Kini Cosma-Nelms hereby demands that on or before the date set for trial in the matter of this case, SELF-DEFENSE, et. seq., produce ALL documents, records, transcribed notes, police reports described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, at the entitled Court FOR WHICH ANTICIPATED PROSECUTION WILL BE DETERMINED. Dated this 19th day of July, 2006 _________________________________ Kini Cosma-Nelms

EXHIBIT A

I. The witness, public and private persons, has possession or control of the following documents or other things and shall produce them at the time and place specified in the Court prosecution occurs. All documentation proclaiming the intentional and malicious civil right violations, human right violations, the resolution and accountability of the Cosma Trust, and damages thereof in the matter of Kini Cosma-Nelms, Case No. 1:05-CV-01201-LAS, filled out, signed and filed in such Courts executed on or about the years from 1989-2006. II. Good cause exists for the production of the documents or other things described in paragraphs 1 of page 1 for the following reasons: a) To show the pattern of intentional deprivation of civil and human right violations and the principal manifestation for the occurring execution that was designed to bring about the present prosecution, distinct and palpable injuries, to cripple and handicap and allow bodily injury, nervousness, self-inflicted damages, deprivation of property, and ongoing emotional distress and psychiatric injuries would result in the imminent death of Kini Cosma-Nelms while she was engaged in constitutionally protected activity and in the privacy of her home. b) To show, inter alia, the onset when public and private persons began to flout the law with ongoing patterns of propensities for extortion, psychiatric injuries, violence, deliberate indifference, ongoing surveillance without a cause, provocation of outrage through the use of illegal tactics, and retaliation against Kini Cosma-Nelms as a result of her being a complaining witness while redressing her grievances. c) To show public and private person would not be held accountable, nor have to pay damage claims to Kini Cosma-Nelms nor award summary judgments so that: (i) Kini Cosma-Nelms could not afford effective counsel and have to suffer cruel and unusual hardships (ii) Malicious prosecutions could be justified (iii) Whatever financial resources Kini Cosma-Nelms left would be exhausted (iv) Kini Cosma-Nelms could be compelled to submit by force or by threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, extreme pain or kidnapping; (v) To substantially impair Kini Cosma-Nelms’s power to appraise or control her conduct. III These documents or other things described in paragraph 1, page 1, are material to the issues involved in this case for the following reasons: a) To show there was an orchestrated litany of Kini Cosma-Nelm’s bedrock rights violated. That it could be said Kini Cosma-Nelms suffered the present prosecution and coinciding injuries described in the her complaints as a result of not being appointed Assistance of Counsel for her defense (Amendment VI) while incarcerated at the onset of the extortion by public officials (Subtitle D-Equal Justice For Women in the Courts Act §40401. Short title) b) To show the pattern, not predicated upon a single act, but consisting of a persistent and continuous course of conduct that has had the ultimate effect of rendering authorized violations of the law by both public and private persons (Extortion, retaliation, deliberate indifference, violence) c) To show that a form of legalized murder has been implemented d) To show there was not any concerted effort to investigate Kini Cosma-Nelm’s substantiated complaint(s) since 1989. (Affirmative action was denied and all of her reports and complaints were ignored, dismissed, and unresponded to. I, Kini Cosma-Nelms, hereby declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: July 19, 2006 ______________________________ Kini Cosma-Nelms,

We Don't Understand, "She Won't Pay Her Bills!"

Honorable Retired Police Sargeant and Attorney Randy Bowman, had tried to say that I pursued women who looked similiar to victim "Tanya". See this website of the bully that caused the suicide of Marlene Braun. He looks just like Ron Huntsinger!http://www.bullyinginstitute.org/braun/huntsinger.html

TO: THE WOMEN OF THE UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HONORABLE GREGORY G.. HOLLOW, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND
HONORABLE CRAIG KELLISON, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
For the City of Susanville, County of Lassen, State of California

(Kellison knew that their American punks were menacing the living daylights out me. His office was within 4 blocks of my home. I, myself, placed leaflets in the mail slot of his doorway)

Plaintiff proceeds as a jew, an unmarried woman, a sex offender, a dike, in pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has “failed to comport with all rules of the FRAP” in cases: U.S.C.A. 98-16415: U.S.C.A. 98-16415: U.S.C.A. 98-16672: U.S.C.A. 98-16673: U.S.C.C. 98-090819: U.S.D.C. 98-00618: U.S.D.C. CV-F-97-5994: CV-02-01704-WBS/GGH: U.S.C.A. 04-70711: 34d. Appell. Dist: 3 Civil C028174: 3 Civil C031259: 3 Civil C046114: U.S.D.C. C-04-0618 SBA (PR); C.A. Supreme Ct. C028174: U.S.D.C. CIV-S-04-681 MCE GGH PS; Napa Superior Ct. CR26838; U.S.C.A. 03-15084; MIS-S-02-0236 WBS GGH-PS; Lassen Superior Ct. TR060989; TR059474; CRd018285; TR050932; CR019489; JC36801; TR070589; TR071517; JC389326; JC38896; Placer Superior Ct. SJV2396...

The court has granted plaintiff an opportunity to present an amended complaint and explained the matters to be included therein. The court has concluded that further opportunity to amend would be unavailing. Within ten days after being served with the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate, plaintiff may file written objections with the court.

COMES NOW, Once upon a time there was a little chubby blond haired girl (herein referred to as “Tanya") as a child, she was bullied and made fun of. Other children teased here as she grew older because she had big breasts. This infuriated her. One day, Tanya made a pact with herself. She would gain power and bully people for all the pain she suffered as a child.

Finally, she had her chance. She became a police officer. All grown up now, the men seemed to like her. But the women were catty, stuck up, and snobby. Tanya was the hit of the police department. She quickly learned that the male officers would do anything for her. As she got even for all of the childhood abuse she had taken, the male officers seemed to roar with laughter, “What a tough broad!” The more she bullied others, the more pleased men seemed to be. Pretty soon, she began to have “romances” with all the men on the police force. Highway patrol officers and city police.

Then one day, she encountered a woman in distress. This would surely be the butt of all jokes she thought. Well, Tanya grew up to be the most stunning, drop dead, gorgeous woman in all the world (That was of course, after Princess Dianna passed away.) She constantly needed to be protected by other officers. As she grew up, people gawked at her and she developed a complex. She then thought everyone wanted her body. Right away everyone across the nation became involved at protecting her.

In the City of Napa, State of California, Sargeant Randy Bowman, (herein referred to as “Caiaphas”), aka private investigator, registered with Consumers Affairs in Sacramento, aka “Corporal”, aka honorably retired Attorney registered with the California Bar Association, aka Herod the King, boldly enlisted himself to do the job.

With a magnifying glass, Caiaphas found all kinds of constitutionally protected items used in a court of law to send the little lady with two children off to prison. The little lady (herein referred to as “Esther”) didn’t have a chance. Matter of fact, she was 5’4”, brown haired, and not too voluptuous . She looked a little butchy and was considered crazy. This piqued men’s curiosity and they knew they could take advantage. (Easy prey)

Tanya, also aka the “Tanya Harding of the sworn police officers”, who once pronounced to the brown haired lady, Esther, “Don’t you just love these love/hate relationships?”, decided that only blonds should rule the world. She went on a campaign to hire only blonds; tall ones. There was nowhere for brown haired girls except as a flower beyond the mountains. 1

___________________________________
1. Salome had to portray a benevolent public servant.

Caiaphas, of course, offered to help in anyway he could. He knew exactly how many plys of toilet tissue Esther used. To make sure she never enjoyed another relationship again, Caiaphas accused Esther of promiscuity and infidelity. He also knew that as a child, Esther dreamt of marrying the right person and having a family. (See Rito Garcia, former Napa police officer, who wanted to be a cop all his life).

To betray his own people, Caiaphas also aka King Saul, dreamt of ways he could cause Esther to stumble and fall. She was unworthy of becoming a productive citizen, unworthy to be called a bag lady even. Esther’s only employment in this life was to clean up the vomit from drunks. Day and night, as he layed in bed, he dreamt of ways to exile Esther forever. He kicked down her paralegal sign and gritted his teeth from frustration. When he learned that Esther had horses, Caiaphas became so mad that he almost committed suicide with his own gun. Finally, the day came when he sat with the prosecutor, ringing his hands in grief that now the case of the sea shell, marble, crunched up piece of paper, and merry Christmas balloon could be put to rest.

June 9, 2004 By Kini Cosma

They Wanted To Lay Their Hands On Me

Anniversary Tribute To David Hurley

February 12, 1965-August 13, 2001

-By Kini-

David worked as a dental lab assistant, enjoyed spending time with his family and friends, cooking, music, dancing, and animals. He is preceded in death by his family, including Nancy Summers of Susanville who is employed at the Lassen Department of Community Development. (WARNING: There are no "Whistle Blower" laws to provide havens of protection. Another "ACT" Congress can consider after) Stay tuned for the upcoming story of 'You May Only Have One Horse'...At http://mustangzone.blogspot.com)

David Hurley passed away as a result of having to take excessive psychiatric medication while unattended by "physicians", from the Lassen County Mental Health In Susanville, California.

Through the younger years we grew together. I'll never forget the day we met through my brother. The best years had I spent with you having fun and joy. Our relationship was a mystical one. We would laugh until we were absolutely exhausted. Laughing at the most funniest of things. At times we led a risky life like the time we drove around in that Barracuda, stopped for gas, and I pulled off the steering wheel. We all just screamed for dear life. Or, the time we rode my motorcycle to Lake Tahoe clad in our cut offs: Me driving in my bikini top and you with no shirt. What a sight to behold.

As our journey through this life caused our friendships to scatter, I often thought about you and the memories we shared never knowing where on this green earth you could have been. Then that day when I was waling in what seemed like positively in the middle of nowhere, you appeared. You jumped out of that truck and we both started screaming and hugging. Boy, that neighborhood must of thought we were out of our minds. The joy we experienced was absolutely incredible that day. YOU even said that it was an act of G-d!

I am sorry that I could not have been the friend that I wanted to be to you. I did not have the strength. The battles that I am surviving have caused me to be strong only within myself for a time. My hope was that one day you would see me be victorious and we would resume a healthy relationship. And, maybe someday I will be victorious. Then I will look toward the heavens and will see your face in my minds eye and know that you are clapping saying my name the way you have always.

At times we were distant from one another. At times we grew apart. And, at times our hearts were cold. But deep inside we had a bond. Truly, your mercy did I see. There was so much for us to do in the time ahead. But, your journey on this earth was already timed.

Well, now, most of the old clan has passed on. You guy sure were young to depart from this earth. But, my dear loving David, I believe that you are in the presence of joy. Still, we will be missing you friend, brother, and uncle.

Have Ya Ever Seen.....

Have ya ever been to a library and seen a woman stuffed in an animal cage? Just go to California and get accused of putting a chrunched up piece of paper, a merry xmas balloon and sea shell in front of the home of a blond. Once you get shipped to Timbuk Tu, there the authorities will be more than glad to let you see the after death of hell.